Current:Home > reviewsWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -Visionary Wealth Guides
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
Indexbit View
Date:2025-04-06 17:16:17
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- China says Philippines has 'provoked trouble' in South China Sea with US backing
- Manager of pet grooming salon charged over death of corgi that fell off table
- ParkMobile $32.8 million settlement: How to join class
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Through 'The Loss Mother's Stone,' mothers share their grief from losing a child to stillbirth
- Wisconsin kayaker who faked his death and fled to Eastern Europe is in custody, online records show
- This house from 'Home Alone' is for sale. No, not that one.
- Bodycam footage shows high
- When does 'No Good Deed' come out? How to watch Ray Romano, Lisa Kudrow's new dark comedy
Ranking
- Small twin
- The Voice Season 26 Crowns a New Winner
- California judges say they’re underpaid, and their new lawsuit could cost taxpayers millions
- Wisconsin kayaker who faked his death and fled to Eastern Europe is in custody, online records show
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Jim Leach, former US representative from Iowa, dies at 82
- Secretary of State Blinken is returning to the Mideast in his latest diplomatic foray
- Through 'The Loss Mother's Stone,' mothers share their grief from losing a child to stillbirth
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Beyoncé's BeyGood charity donates $100K to Houston law center amid Jay
Alex Jones keeps Infowars for now after judge rejects The Onion’s winning auction bid
Shanghai bear cub Junjun becomes breakout star
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
Singaporean killed in Johor expressway crash had just paid mum a surprise visit in Genting
Worst. Tariffs. Ever. (update)
Google forges ahead with its next generation of AI technology while fending off a breakup threat